Posted by: Morton A. Klein, president, ZOA
February 11, 2014
ZOA Critical of Pres. Obama’s Exec. Order Permitting Immigrants with “Limited” Terrorist Connections
SHARE THIS WITH YOUR FRIENDS
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) is strongly critical of President Barack Obama’s decision to issue an executive order permitting immigrants to the United States who have provided “limited material support” to terrorists who are believed to pose a threat to the U.S. The ZOA believes that weakening a major and obvious legal precaution against inadvertently importing into America extremists who have provided any support to anti-American terrorist groups is mistake so obvious, glaring and dangerous as to require little explanation.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the State Department published the new exemptions last Wednesday in the Federal Register to narrow a ban in the Immigration and Nationality Act excluding refugees and asylum seekers who had provided limited material support, no matter how minor, to terrorists.
A former State Department official and current director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, Jessica Vaughan, has questioned the legitimacy of the Obama Administration unilaterally altering the law passed by the U.S. Congress, saying, “[T]here is a very legitimate question as to whether the administration actually has the authority to change the law in this way … It seems to me that they are announcing that they will be disregarding yet another law written by Congress that they don’t like and are replacing it with their own guidelines, which in this case appear to be extremely broad and vague, and which are sure to be exploited by those seeking to game our generous refugee admissions program … If the recent past is any guide, those evaluating these cases will be ordered to ignore red flags in the applications, especially if the applicant is supported by one of the many advocacy groups that have the ear of senior DHS staff … This is how we end up with families like the Tsarnaev brothers [the Boston marathon bombers], who were originally admitted for political asylum” (Caroline May, ‘Obama admin unilaterally changes law to allow immigrants with ‘limited’ terror contact into US,’ Daily Caller, February 5, 2014).
ZOA has released the following statement:
“A DHS official has said that these new exemptions are ‘commonsense’ and only apply on a case-by-case basis after careful check and review. This is unconvincing. If a radical Muslim refugee, for example, who once helped a terrorist group in a minor way –– say, gave a small donation to a Sunni terrorist group in Syria or distributed some pamphlets for such a group, why is it reasonable to let such a person to come to our shores? Isn’t is entirely possible that such an ideologically extreme person would make an ideal member of an Islamist terrorist cell in the U.S.?
“The DHS says that it will make background checks on such people. Well, what sort of effective background checks can it conduct in Syria, even if the country was not in the midst of the carnage of an on-going civil war? What sort of background checks can it conduct in Libya, or Iraq or Afghanistan, where President Karzai recently freed actual terrorists, despite U.S. objections? Will the Karzai government give us all the information we need on such cases?
“If these new exemptions are ‘commonsense,’ why didn’t President Obama take these proposed changes to the Congress? Was he afraid that Congress would find that the proposed changes lack commonsense?
“In his State of the Union address, President Obama said, ‘if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future, to reduce pollution, prepare our communities for the consequences of climate change, and speed the transition to more sustainable sources of energy.’ Whether this is legitimate of not, President Obama foreshadowed that his executive orders would be focused on the environment and jobs. Now, in the first such order we know about, we find he is bypassing the Congress on a matter of national security, during a period of increasing danger from radical Islamist terrorists.
“Especially at a time of Middle East turmoil and proliferating Islamist terrorist groups in the region, do the American people really want President Obama to make it easier for people with even a limited connection with such groups to enter the United States?”
“We should err on the side of caution and the protection of the American people, not dangerous permissiveness and unwise flexibility when it comes national security.”