‘Judea’ and ‘Samaria’ are faithful to history, as U.S. lawmakers increasingly realize.
By Gideon Israel
(February 5, 2026 / WSJ) In the Middle East, a place name is never just a name—it is a claim. For decades, the term “West Bank” has stripped the land of its historical identity. A mid-20th-century substitution, it replaced the indigenous names Judea and Samaria with a generic compass point to sever the Jewish connection to the region in the eyes of the world.
Now U.S. lawmakers in at least a dozen states and both houses of Congress are advancing legislation to restore these original names in official U.S. documents. More than updating nomenclature, they are reclaiming a stolen identity and forcing a collision between manufactured labels and the weight of history.
This shift promises to correct a profound geographical blurring. People see “the West Bank” on the news and “Judea and Samaria” in Scripture, unaware they are frequently looking at the same soil. Even those who know the stories of Abraham and the prophets often treat these hills as a mythical realm. By formalizing these names, legislators are bridging this gap, reconnecting these modern identities to their 3,000-year-old roots.
To see only “the West Bank” is to view a sterile geopolitical entity: a narrow strip of land defined by 20th-century skirmishes and modern conflict. “Judea and Samaria” (areas south and north of Jerusalem that are frequently named together) helps transform the landscape into a heritage, reminding the visitor that he is standing where Abraham received the promise and the Patriarchs purchased land in Hebron and Shechem. This is the cradle of Western monotheism. America’s Founders drew inspiration from these hills as they scattered the names of biblical towns across the maps of our own states.
Judea and Samaria are crucial to Israel’s survival. Their ridges tower up to 3,000 feet over the coastal plain where 70% of Israel’s population and Ben Gurion Airport reside. These highlands are a strategic asset that protects the country from invasion. Without them, Israel would be less than 10 miles wide at its narrowest point and indefensible. The Jordan Valley to the east acts as a buffer, its steep slopes forming a barrier against invasion. Lt. Gen. Tom Kelly famously noted that Israel couldn’t be defended without the terrain of Judea and Samaria.
The return to these names is a recognition of a 3,000-year-old blueprint. Samaria is a region born of a tangible transaction in the ninth century B.C., mentioned more than 100 times as the heart of the Northern Kingdom. From the days of Elijah to the promises of Jeremiah, these hills were a literal, geographical place.
To the south, “Judea” carries an equally indelible pedigree as the birthplace of the Davidic line and home of the returning exiles. Critically, Judea wasn’t merely a religious term. Even under the Persian Empire, it was the official administrative name for the province.
This naming remained standard into the first century. Christian scriptures treat Judea and Samaria not as symbols, but as the actual districts on the Roman map. These accounts describe a world where traveling through Samaria was a part of daily life, proving that a millennium after the kings of Israel, the world still used these names.
The shift away from them was a deliberate act of political cancellation. After crushing a Jewish revolt in the second century, Emperor Hadrian sought to sever the Jewish connection to the land by renaming the province “Syria Palaestina”—a name derived from the long-vanished Philistines. When the Romans conquered Jerusalem in the year 70, commemorative coins were stamped “IUDAEA CAPTA,” meaning “Judea Captured.”
Even the modern international community has used these enduring names. When the United Nations drafted the 1947 Partition Plan, it repeatedly referred to Judea and Samaria as official geographical markers. It is a striking irony: The same global body where these names are controversial was once unable to describe the land by any other means.
The transition to “West Bank” occurred in 1950, when Jordan annexed the territory. This political rebranding, recognized by only a handful of countries, sought to justify a Jordanian presence west of the river. It lasted only a couple of decades, yet it managed to cloud thousands of years of history.
By replacing “the West Bank” with “Judea and Samaria,” American lawmakers are doing more than making a geopolitical statement. They are affirming a worldview rooted in biblical record while fighting the erasure of the foundations upon which Western civilization is built.
Mr. Israel is an adviser to the National Association of Christian Lawmakers.
This article was originally published in by the Wall Street Journal and can be viewed here.