Hanoch Marmari, a former editor-in-chief of Ha’aretz, details the multiple failures of Gideon Levy and his editors with respect to the publication of the “apartheid” poll article and its paltry clarification. If only the current editor would speak out.

In a letter sent to Congress early last month, Christian leaders engaged in an obvious attempt to blacken Israel’s name.

The Harvard Kennedy School provided a platform for notorious anti-Israel detractor Diana Buttu. The results — including a string of demonstrable falsehoods — were predictable.

One day after the Ha’aretz clarification, Gideon Levy himself also published an apology for his column claiming that most Israelis support an apartheid regime. The partial apology indicates that Levy has no understanding of what he did wrong to elicit such a forceful backlash.

Edmund Sanders article today in the Los Angeles Times about a purported increase in attempts by Jewish worshipers to pray on the Temple Mount unnecessarily exacerbates tensions by publishing false Palestinian accusations as fact.

Days after a false headline alleging that the majority of Jews support apartheid in Israel, Ha’aretz buries a clarification on page 5. This is the second time within two months that Ha’aretz corrected an erroneous page-one headline. Will editors conduct an internal inquiry?

ReVista de Medio Oriente staff have elicited a correction from El País on an article published in the Spanish daily describing Gilad Shalit as an “Israeli soldier involved in the Gaza Massacre.”

A popular narrative in the media contends that the Palestinian Authority has been exemplary in its cooperation with Israel, while Israel and Jewish settlers are responsible for the stalled peace process.

Do most Israelis support an apartheid regime in the country and do they advocate discrimination against Arabs? An article by Gideon Levy in Ha’aretz highlighted with sensational but distorted headlines twists facts to promote the apartheid canard against Israel.

Akiva Eldar responds to the Presspectiva/CAMERA exposé concerning his false report that the Israeli government has acknowledged that Jews are the minority between the river and the sea. He partially acknowledges the falsehood, and also introduces a new distorted figure.